Karl Noelle

Link September 29 21:20 86 notes

What are we supposed to do with Google+?

I feel the same way.

maniacalrage:

I find Google+ confusing. Not its features or its design, but rather how I’m meant to use it. I find myself regularly asking the following questions:

  • Is Plus simply Google’s version of Facebook? Maybe. But if that’s the case, does that mean I should switch from Facebook to Google+? And if I do…
  1. nepblog reblogged this from maniacalrage
  2. beautifulpixiepixel liked this
  3. caseymac liked this
  4. mrbushido liked this
  5. bdougherty liked this
  6. zyrcster liked this
  7. ismaelsobek reblogged this from maniacalrage
  8. skelly liked this
  9. inkyeagle reblogged this from maniacalrage
  10. levisan liked this
  11. morrick reblogged this from maniacalrage and added:
    Garrett raises some thoughtful questions I’ve been
  12. morrick liked this
  13. dezinezync answered: Kevin Rose had earlier stated that it’s wise to simply use G+ as a blog, and nothing else.
  14. lakshmis liked this
  15. benjacob reblogged this from maniacalrage
  16. pdc reblogged this from maniacalrage
  17. monokuroumu answered: Google is about integration - so regarding photos - they land on Picasa account, which is connected to your G+ account. Was it helpfull? ;]
  18. taufiq reblogged this from maniacalrage
  19. koolinus answered: the thing I’m disappointed the most by G+ is being added by COMPLETE strangers even if I do not push content there. Gotta check privacy
  20. willw liked this
  21. karlnoelle reblogged this from maniacalrage
  22. flamezgeek reblogged this from maniacalrage
  23. jorgeq liked this
  24. mattwilson answered: To me, it’s Facebook for people who work together: might not want/need to “friend” them in FB, but Circles allow us to share x-teams.
  25. llllostandffffound answered: I asked those same questions, and then decided that in asking those questions it was too much work to begin with. Flickr + Facebook + Tumblr.
  26. robertablake liked this
  27. pixelchirp liked this
  28. georges liked this
  29. alt-4326 liked this
  30. caseyweed answered: I have no idea. Facebook slowly seems to be a chimera of tacked on features that are in response to Google+, while G+ just sits there.
  31. mike3k liked this
  32. derekpcollins liked this
  33. stewartmccoy liked this
  34. gblakeman liked this
  35. darkillumination liked this
  36. thegreyhound liked this
  37. doraeminemon answered: Google plus is for people want Twitter and Facebook combined, I think. It similar to Android where they want to build a Blackberry + iPhone.
  38. jonathanmoore liked this
  39. aparticularpath reblogged this from maniacalrage
  40. aparticularpath liked this
  41. monstersetc liked this
  42. 3rdmartini liked this
  43. oftenhover liked this
  44. robesxpierre liked this
  45. robesxpierre reblogged this from maniacalrage
  46. tinyclicks liked this
  47. punkassjim answered: Exactly how I feel about it. And honestly, I’m sick of companies “fracturing the landscape” simply because they wanna “get in on the action”.
  48. Show more notesLoading...
  • Home
  • Archive
  • Karl's Q & A
  • RSS

About Karl Noelle

Graphic & interactive designer in Minneapolis, MN; appreciator of fine details; runner & drummer; lover of Apple & Adobe.

portfolio | twitter | dribbble | last.fm | flickr | google+

© 2011 Karl Noelle. Designed by Tom Brunoli.